Tag Archives: research

Minnesotans geared up for e-bike rebates. Now data reveals more about them

Republished from CTS News (Catalyst) for October 14, 2025

More than 14,600 Minnesota residents applied for a rebate through the state’s e-bike rebate program when it launched in 2024. Established by the Minnesota Legislature to help reduce the cost of buying a new e-bike, the program was so popular that within minutes of opening in June 2024, the number of applicants overwhelmed the system and crashed the website. The state was forced to fix the technology challenges and reopen the application about a month later.

The scenario drove researchers at the University of Minnesota to dig deeper into the data about who applied for the rebate in the first year. Their project aims to shed light on who benefitted from the program, get feedback on the application process, and learn more about rebate use.

E-bikes, which operate like a bicycle but have an electric battery and motor for pedaling assistance, have increased in popularity in recent years, and supporters are promoting their potential as a sustainable transportation option. The state legislature allocated $2 million in both 2024 and 2025 for the rebate program.

“Minnesotans seem to have an appetite to get an e-bike, whether that’s because of the state’s incentive or for other reasons—including that Minnesota has some of the best bike infrastructure around,” says Kaitlyn Denten, a researcher with the Humphrey School’s Institute for Urban and Regional Infrastructure Finance (IURIF) and project co-lead.

For the first part of this project, researchers analyzed rebate applicant data, which included demographic information, income level, tax filing status, and ZIP code but no personal identifiers. Data also included a person’s rebate application status, the rebate amount, and whether the applicant used the rebate to purchase a new e-bike.

In the program’s first year, the maximum rebate was $1,500; individual amounts depended on an applicant’s income level and tax filing status. People who applied for and received a rebate certificate could purchase their e-bike and eligible bike accessories from a participating retailer. Of the total applicants, 1,519 people received a rebate and 1,327 used one to purchase an e-bike. According to the data, half of the rebates went to households earning less than $75,000 a year.

The Twin Cities seven-county metro area had strong representation, with 66 percent of applicants, 67 percent of recipients, and 66 percent of rebate users coming from the metro area. The average age of applicants was 49 years old.

For the project’s second part, researchers used an online survey to collect feedback on the application process and information about how people who received a rebate were using their e-bike, among other data. The survey, which was available between March 17, 2025, and April 5, 2025, received nearly 4,500 responses.  

Of the survey respondents, 3,920 individuals applied for a rebate, 496 received a rebate, and 455 used the rebate to purchase an e-bike. For those who received a rebate but didn’t use it, among the reasons cited were that the rebate didn’t cover enough of the e-bike’s cost and the rebate certificate expired before they were able to use it. 

One surprising finding: Some people bought an e-bike even if they didn’t receive a rebate, says CTS scholar Camila Fonseca-Sarmiento, IURIF director of fiscal research and project co-lead. “Or, if a couple received a rebate, they ended up buying two e-bikes. This could be spurring the use of e-bikes instead of personal vehicles.”

Many survey respondents expressed frustration with the initial application process, referring to the technical glitches, long wait times, and unclear instructions. Several respondents did note, however, that the second application round ran more smoothly.

Some respondents also raised concerns about the fairness of the program’s rollout, pointing to barriers faced by people with limited internet access and electronic devices, people with disabilities, and people with inflexible work schedules (the application period opened on a weekday).

Future research should focus on the effects of 2025 program changes, including income eligibility, application processes, and rebate amount, the researchers say. In addition, researchers noted that a statewide travel study could help assess how rebates might influence a shift from personal vehicle use to an e-bike, a question left unanswered because of limited e-bike use among current rebate recipients.

This research project was sponsored by the Applied Research in Transportation (ART) Program, which addresses time-sensitive research questions in a 6 to 12 month timeframe. CTS and the Minnesota Department of Transportation contributed initial funding to launch this pilot program in 2024, with the Metropolitan Council joining in 2025. To reinforce the applied nature of the program, ART projects must directly address a current process, document, or policy need with an initial focus on sustainability in transportation and climate change impacts.

—Peter Raeker, contributing writer  

Related Research from MnDOT

Operational Characteristics of Conventional and Electric-Assisted Bicycles and Their Riders (ongoing)

Assessing the Economic Impact and Health Benefits of Bicycling in Minnesota

Human behavior insights are driving transportation safety forward

Reprinted from CTS News Catalyst, September 11, 2025

To better understand how roadway crashes can be prevented, it’s essential to explore the human behaviors that contribute to them. This objective is core to the work of the U of M’s Human Factors Safety Laboratory (HFSL). Research Associate Professor and CTS scholar Nichole Morris, who directs the lab, outlined its mission and impact in a recent Toward Zero Deaths (TZD) webinar highlighting Minnesota’s traffic safety research ecosystem. 

Minnesota TZD is the state’s cornerstone traffic safety program, employing an interdisciplinary approach to reducing traffic crashes, injuries, and deaths on the state’s roads. CTS partners with TZD to provide program administration, event coordination, and communications.

The HFSL brings together behavioral scientists and engineers dedicated to reducing roadway and occupational injuries and fatalities. They combine research on human behavior with the design and testing of user-centered systems to create solutions that work better for everyone.

“Human factors is the intersection between people and systems,” Morris explained. From in-vehicle technologies and roadway signage to partnerships with larger organizations such as law enforcement, transportation systems involve a wide range of human-system interactions.

Four research tracks shape the lab’s work:

  • Crash reporting. Although projects often intersect, crash reporting is foundational to the other research tracks. Morris refers to it as the lifeblood of transportation safety—without crash data, researchers don’t know what’s working and what isn’t. In one of its more consequential projects, the HFSL helped rebuild the front end of MNCrash—an application designed for law enforcement to document and report crashes. In close collaboration with the Minnesota Departments of Transportation and Public Safety as well as multiple law enforcement agencies, the HFSL team helped to streamline the user experience and improve data completeness and accuracy. Since deploying the updated version in 2016, MNCrash has been adopted by all law enforcement agencies across Minnesota. It’s featured in the sixth edition of the USDOT’s Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria and has become the national standard for crash reporting.
  • Maintenance and work-zone safety. In one project, leveraging the expertise and methods gained from MNCrash, the lab collaborated with MnDOT and maintenance workers on a streamlined app to make documenting work-zone intrusions easier. After its launch in 2022, the team continued work, using low-cost sensors and radar to help reduce select work-zone driving speeds in real time.
  • Pedestrian and non-motorist safety. The Stop for Me campaign, a collaboration with MnDOT, St. Paul, Ramsey County, and Western Michigan University, has been adopted in communities across Minnesota. The campaign—which combines enforcement and engineering treatments to improve yielding at crosswalks—has inspired similar efforts in more cities around the country. Other projects include studies on dedicated right-turn lanes and temporary and permanent pedestrian infrastructure to reduce conflicts between drivers and pedestrians.
  • Infrastructure and signage. The lab’s work on J-turns, which have proven effective at reducing fatal crashes, has helped to identify and address several navigational errors drivers may make when first encountering this type of intersection. The researchers have found that poor or confusing first experiences with J-turns can lead to negative community perceptions and result in pushback on J-turn implementation. The research has found specific pavement markings to help guide drivers and facilitate successful use of J-turns—leading to fewer crashes and better driver experiences.

Morris emphasized that investment in sound research methods and collaborations across partner institutions, organizations, and communities is what creates successful research outcomes. While studies may yield results in the moment, she says investing in methodology is what really carries the work forward. The HSFL’s work continues to inspire other states and agencies, Morris added.

—Krysta Rzeszutek, CTS digital editor

Related research from Nichole Morris

Incorporating Sustainability into the Procurement Process

The production and use of construction materials for transportation projects have varying impacts on the environment based on factors such as production process, transportation and material inputs. To mitigate negative outcomes, MnDOT sought to incorporate environmental impacts into the procurement process for concrete mixtures and concrete pavement. This project provided a framework for considering environmental impacts and standardizing a reporting system to encourage the use of low-carbon construction materials in infrastructure projects.

Continue reading Incorporating Sustainability into the Procurement Process

TZD Traffic Safety Hotdish: Research in Action—Perspectives from Minnesota’s Traffic Safety Research Ecosystem

July 16, 2025
1:00–2:15 p.m. Central
Virtual via Zoom

Join us as our very own “Roads” Scholars share more about their recent traffic safety research. Presenters from the University of Minnesota and Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) will share findings from recent projects and talk about the collaborations that drive traffic safety research throughout Minnesota.

Speakers

  • Jackie Jiran, PE—MnDOT
  • Max Moreland, PE, PTOE—MnDOT
  • Nichole Morris, PhD—University of Minnesota
  • Mark Wagner, PE—MnDOT
  • Kyle Shelton, PhD—University of Minnesota; Moderator

Registration

The webinar is free to attend, but registration is required. Once you have registered, you will receive an email confirmation with a Zoom link. The link should not be shared with others; it is unique to you.

Credit

Attendees are eligible for 1.25 Professional Development Hours (PDHs). Download the PDH credit form (PDF) for your records.

For complete information, go to TZD Traffic Safety Hotdish.

Industrial by-products prove sustainable options for managing roadside stormwater

Reprinted from CTS News, March 25, 2025

Roadside soil plays a crucial role in stormwater management. Naturally vegetated roadsides can filter and control runoff, helping to keep pollutants out of bodies of water and minimizing flooding to communities. However, soil left behind from road construction does not adequately support filtration and plant growth unless it’s amended with organic matter—and traditional mixtures for doing so, such as with sand and compost, can be costly and resource-intensive. 

sample plots
Field plots adjacent to the Natural Resources Research Institute parking lot were used to test the infiltration capacity, pollutant removal, and vegetative support capabilities of the soil mixtures.

To find a more sustainable solution, U of M researchers partnered with MnDOT and the Minnesota Local Road Research Board. Building on previous research, a team led by CTS scholar David Saftner, principal investigator and associate professor in the UMD Department of Civil Engineering, tested sustainable roadside soil mixtures using locally available waste materials and by-products generated from forestry, agriculture, and industrial activities.

In this project, nine materials were selected for testing, including a peat/biochar mix; dredged river sediment; pine and ash sawdust; VersaLime (a by-product of sugar beet processing); lime mud, bottom ash, and degritter (from a pulp and paper mill); and recycled concrete aggregate (RCA). All nine materials proved efficient at removing pollutants, though some were more effective than others. After extensive laboratory testing, the five top-performing materials were selected and used to create three engineered soil blends:

  • RCA (80%) and ash sawdust (20%)
  • RCA (80%) and peat/biochar (20%)
  • Dredge sediment (80%) and degritter (20%)

Field testing of these three engineered soil blends took place in outdoor plots. The team studied infiltration rate, pollutant removal, and plant growth from grass and flower seed. Through a life-cycle assessment, the researchers also evaluated material collection and transport, energy demand, human health and ecosystem impacts, climate change, and water use.

Their research revealed that all three engineered soil blends were effective at capturing and filtering the first inch of excess stormwater runoff, offering a viable alternative to traditional soil mixes. Other key findings: 

  • Of the engineered soil mixes, organic and coarser materials were better at allowing water to pass through.
  • Greenhouse tests showed promising plant growth, while field plots experienced challenges—possibly due to seasonal dryness.
  • The dredge sediment and degritter soil mix had substantially higher impacts than the other two soil mixes as well as the most CO2 emissions.
  • The RCA and ash sawdust soil mix had the lowest impacts, with the RCA and peat/biochar soil mix producing similar results.

Based on their findings, a design guide was developed for road engineers outlining best practices for using local by-products and waste materials to create engineered soil mixes while still adhering to regulatory standards. These recommendations are designed to be standard, common, and repeatable. 

“This was a great project and I’m especially happy with the design guide,” Saftner says. “Determining how to implement new procedures is tougher than using tried-and-true methods. Our hope is that the guide will simplify things for practicing engineers looking for more cost-effective, sustainable, and locally sourced solutions.”

The study results also highlighted many of the benefits of engineered soil mixtures including the reuse of waste materials, reduced spending on sand and compost, lower transportation costs, and fewer environmental impacts of transporting material. 

Further research on the reuse of waste materials includes another multi-phased project incorporating biochar. The first phase of that project should be finished this summer, with the second phase kicking off in summer 2026.

—Krysta Rzeszutek, CTS digital editor

Related Resources

Pavement Markings to Support Automated Vehicles

Automated vehicles (AVs) using advanced driver assistance systems depend on pavement markings to accurately track roadway lanes. While MnDOT continues to ensure human drivers easily and effectively detect and interpret various pavement markings, the agency also wanted to understand marking designs and characteristics that support AV functions. Field observations in different locations, during the day and at night, using different data collection methods allowed researchers to evaluate the impact of various pavement marking properties on AV lane-keeping functions. Results support MnDOT in producing pavement marking guidance that is responsive to changing needs.

Continue reading Pavement Markings to Support Automated Vehicles

Comparing the Effectiveness of No Right Turn on Red Sign Types at Traffic Signals

Preventing right turns on red at traffic signals is a generally effective pedestrian safety measure. But when pedestrians are absent, allowing right turns on red can improve traffic flow. Unlike static signs that prohibit right turns on red, dynamic No Right Turn on Red (NRTOR) signs can be activated when pedestrians are present. Comparing driver compliance with dynamic and static signs indicated that each sign type may have its own benefits. 

Continue reading Comparing the Effectiveness of No Right Turn on Red Sign Types at Traffic Signals

Examining Driver Preferences for Lane Line Patterns and Widths

Pavement markings that clearly delineate lanes are important for reducing crashes and improving the safety of drivers. The configurations of these pavement markings—primarily the width and length of the line and the spacing of broken lines—vary from state to state. This project identified driver preferences for pavement marking patterns and widths, which can increase visibility and improve safety.

Continue reading Examining Driver Preferences for Lane Line Patterns and Widths

Examining off-peak transit behaviors to improve transit equity

Originally published in Catalyst, February 19, 2025

Transit service planning has traditionally focused on peak trips and the needs of “rush hour” commuters rather than off-peak travel. Often, off-peak trips are taken by shift-based essential workers and those who cannot or do not drive. The COVID-19 pandemic further underscored the need for a closer examination of these trips to improve social equity.

Continue reading Examining off-peak transit behaviors to improve transit equity

Understanding the Performance of Road Base Stabilization Additives

Full-depth reclamation (FDR)—an effective and efficient pavement reconstruction method—can be made even more sustainable by strengthening the road base. Laboratory and field testing of proprietary stabilizers used to amend FDR material illustrated improvements in pavement stiffness and economic benefits over time. New pavement design standards for base stabilizers can guide road engineers in choosing the optimal products for sustainable roads.

Continue reading Understanding the Performance of Road Base Stabilization Additives